20 Comments

Computerized & statistical modelling is not science. Period. Full-stop.

Expand full comment

Imagine if the countless billions which have disappeared were spent on building modern reactors. Those would actually show reduced greenhouse emissions. Without the ecological horror of sea wind etc.

Expand full comment

And how often has their "modeling" ever been close to actual results?? It's quite laughable really, C02 making up only part of total GHG emissions. I suppose they have a gov funded scientist that can measure water vapor too. Carbon pricing, climate change crisis all in the name of funding future UN DESA initiatives!

Expand full comment

But there is data on the increased tax revenue to be spent on “equity” distribution schemes with complex arrays of grift and huge numbers of civil servants. Can anyone imagine just how bad a Liberal run housing development will be? We can guess well over $1000 per square foot of badly made buildings to be demolished in 15 years.

Expand full comment

Any data specifically confirming an expansion of the bank accounts of crony climate Liberal insiders?

Expand full comment

Sadly the Conservatives signed us up for all of this with AGENDA 2021/2025/2030/2050 FIPA PARIS ACCORDS UNDRIP UN SDG’s and UN ESG’s. Pierre Poilievre will change wording so it sounds better. Then there is the environmental mining disaster of mining for battery materials. The financial rape of a nation!!

Expand full comment

Wow!!!! Politician discovers carbon trading is just another way to get lots of tax cash!!!

In other news.....

The moon is not made of gas.

Solar panels might last 2 decades, are un-recyclable and consume just about the same energy in manufacture they produce over their life cycle.

Windmills need electricity to hold the turbine if the wind is too fast, the wind is too slow or the wind is falling behind on DEI considerations. The blades are un-recyclable.

Carbon tax could do something - but that requires intelligence. Oh. Wait. Politicians. OK, better not do that.....

Expand full comment

I'm thinking of running for national office as an independent (crazy right?).

Here's my platform:

If elected I promise that every bill that is tabled I will vote against, no matter what it's about or who sponsors it. We have enough laws as it is. Furthermore, I will seek to repeal every odious law that's ever been introduced since 1867 forming alliances with anyone who'll support me in that effort. My goal will be to restore the people's ability to live their lives according to their own conscience and personal desires, provided only that they respect the right of their fellow citizens to do likewise.

Furthermore, I will establish committees to investigate and make recommendations on ways to reduce taxation to the minimum needed to maintain basic services, reform the banking system so that it serves the needs of the people, and establish conservative monetary principles with the aim of totally eliminating inflation. Beyond those domestic aims I will also work towards removing Canada from its obligations to such institutions as the World Bank, NATO, the WEF, WHO and IMF. Reform of the UN with like-minded nations will be a condition of Canada remaining a member.

At the government level I will work to introduce term limits for politicians. No more than two consecutive terms to be served by any sitting member. Eligibility for office will be determined by a threshold number of signatures on a petition and campaign finance will be funded entirely by government grants with no corporate donations allowed, and private donations restricted to $1000 per individual. Furthermore, no elected official, after leaving office, may serve as an executive, board member or advisor of any corporation under their jurisdiction for a period of no less than 10 years. Additionally, votes of non-confidence will no longer be done in parliament but by national referendum, a process which will also apply to recall votes of both MPs and federal judges, who likewise will have term limits of 10 years and who will be elected, not appointed, their knowledge of the law and record of service being the only criteria for eligibility.

Obviously there's a whole bunch of other reforms that need to take place once the ball is rolling, but those are the basic non-negotiable elements that we need if our nation is to ever get back on track as a truly democratic state that respects the rights of all its citizens.

Expand full comment

Federal government is supposed to represent all Canadians, so has to stay politically neutral. However, right after the highlighted section of the policy, a Liberal talking point is regurgitated (i.e., "putting money back in the pockets of Canadians"). Isn't that a human rights violation, since it uses public policy to promote political ideology?

Expand full comment

The carbon pricing and net zero has a clear objective. It is to endanger the lives of people and animals.

Expand full comment

He has no data for ANY of the claims he makes - like this one "greenhouse gas emissions that are contributing to the more intense wildfires, droughts, and floods caused by climate change".

The entire global warming paradigm is a cult-like belief system - it is built o lies and fake, propaganda based science.

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/updated-compilation-of-articles-that

plus the movie

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/sensational-movie-exposes-the-mass

We are just as likely to see global cooling by 2040

plus last segment here:

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/women-joining-the-army-to-transition

Not only can no politician anywhere point to any "cause and effect" of their actios, most of them do ot even know how much CO2 is in the air - or how much their measures cost taxpayers to effect zero impactful change in CO2 - they cannot answer the simple question "how much will it cost in taxes i my country to reduce global average temperature by 1 degree C over the next ten or twenty or fifty years - or what the global average temperature SHOULD be or the level of CO2.

Expand full comment

lmfao. so it’s just a tax. they have to get their lies aligned

Expand full comment