A legal proceeding, known as a Class Action, was initiated in response to a criminal cyber-attack on LifeLabs' database containing customer personal health information.
Does this mean LifeLabs is a victim twice over: first by the ransom they paid to the hackers and secondly to the people for whom the data was breached? This could be precedent setting, no?
Well I think the idea is that companies that hold private data have a responsibility to protect it. I didn’t follow the case but I’m assuming they were found to be negligent.
Well I think the idea is that companies that hold private data have a responsibility to protect it. I didn’t follow the case but I’m assuming they were found to be negligent.
Does this mean LifeLabs is a victim twice over: first by the ransom they paid to the hackers and secondly to the people for whom the data was breached? This could be precedent setting, no?
Well I think the idea is that companies that hold private data have a responsibility to protect it. I didn’t follow the case but I’m assuming they were found to be negligent.
Well I think the idea is that companies that hold private data have a responsibility to protect it. I didn’t follow the case but I’m assuming they were found to be negligent.