26 Comments
User's avatar
Lyla Fuller's avatar

Unbelievable that there are still individuals so ignorant as to submit to the “Health Nazi’s”

who are still pushing these murderous vaccines, especially to youth!!!! 😥

Expand full comment
Gina's avatar

Yes good term to describe these health nuts.

Expand full comment
Teuta Blackman's avatar

Unforgivable and very unstable!!

Expand full comment
OUTRAGED HUMAN's avatar

SO MANY DIE AND GET SICK AFTER THE FIRST, SECOND AND ESPECIALLY THE THIRD SHOT, SO I WOULD BE SURPRISED IF PEOPLE CONTINUED TO BUY THIS NARRATIVE

Expand full comment
Lorrie's avatar

Check out her virtue mask, nobody near her....keep the fear going, sickening. Disgusting control tactics.

Expand full comment
Ross S's avatar

YeH, the mask was your first clue to see where this is headed yet again. Fools, everyone of them,

Expand full comment
Gina's avatar

Of course the theatre of the masks for that visual effect of fear.

Expand full comment
Gina's avatar

All theatre and they are outed by the kracken variant beginning of the year.

Expand full comment
Marcus's avatar

Yet again, it is “authorized”. Words matter.

Expand full comment
Wally TangoFoxtrot's avatar

Need to get the specific names providing the authorization and the signers need to know their names are being queried.

Expand full comment
Gina's avatar

Authorized is different from approved. Authorized cant be labelled SAFE OR EFFECTIVE without data results of studies which are not there . The adverse events incriminates them as there are so many.

Expand full comment
Vicki's avatar

What is her name ?

Expand full comment
Mr Ryan Corcoran's avatar

Nice mask that doesn’t work and causes more damage. Hmmm we know you’re using the old vaccines no one wanted. Everywhere is banning the killer vaxx like Florida and other states and countries . You created this Plandemic with the WHO/WEF/UN and we are onto your bullshit

Expand full comment
Greenbunny's avatar

The majority are not buying what they are selling. They cannot even figure out that all the science clearly shows masks are useless/toxic.

Expand full comment
Cathy Baker's avatar

They just won't be let it go..... DO NOT COMPLY!!!

Expand full comment
Nancy Lee-Menard's avatar

Let's hope and pray thAt the majority see he deception that Health Canada is.

Expand full comment
Gina's avatar

Only 6 percent have gotten a vaccine in the last 6 monh and I think its even more like in 12 months with a very small percentage so its clesr Canadians have had enough of this clown show with the theatre of masks. Many seniors maskless and travelling and living normally. It will be the same people running for number 7 but that 6 percent might dwindle down as well. Of course we know those who represent the 6% and its their choice and we dont step on that choice. . At least most of us refuse to be scammed anymore or never scammed.

Expand full comment
Ruth's avatar

Another useless vaccine for a bygone variant. Wish this govenment would stop wasting so much money.

Expand full comment
Gina's avatar

Money laundering

Expand full comment
Mike's avatar

And how many years was this new one safely tested, or will that be now, tested on innocent babies over 6 months old, and others?

Expand full comment
Jamed Goodwin's avatar

Please examine some statistics. Vast numbers of those who received mNRA injections were later diagnosed with COVID. Vast numbers have suffered serious adverse reactions. Many have died as a result of the injection. How much thinking must one do to comprehend that mNRA injections are neither safe nor effective? The evidence is abundantly clear. The mNRA injection does not produce immunity to COVID. Claims that say that it does are a fraud. Calling it a vaccine is also a fraud. It does not meet the definition. "The science" is not to be trusted, for it is not science. It is fraud.

Senior Pfizer executive Janine Small has admitted on October 10, 2022 that the drug company did not know whether its COVID vaccine prevented transmission of the virus when it began rolling out the shots globally. Small, Pfizer’s president of international developed markets, testified before the European Union Parliament answering the question by Dutch MEP Rob Roos.

“Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?” Mr. Roos asked. “If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want a straight answer, yes or no, and I’m looking forward to it.”

Ms. Small, who appeared in the place of Pfizer chief executive Albert Bourla, who had been called to testify but pulled out of the hearing, replied that the company had to “move at the speed of science”. “Regarding the question around, um, did we know about stopping the immunisation [sic] before it entered the market? No, heh,” she said.

“Uh, these, um, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market, and from that point of view we had to do everything at risk. I think Dr. Bourla, even though he’s not here, would turn around and say to you himself, ‘If not us then who?’”

Ms. Small said Dr. Bourla “actually felt the importance of what was going on in the world, and therefore as a result of that, we actually, um, spent $US 2 billion, at risk, of self-funded money from Pfizer, to be able to research, develop and manufacture at risk, to be able to make sure that we were in a position to be able to help with the pandemic”.

Mr. Roos shared a brief clip of Ms. Small’s response on Twitter, describing the answer as “scandalous”.

“Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth that ‘you do it for others’,” he said in the video, which has been viewed more than five million times.

“Now this turned out to be a cheap lie. This should be exposed.”

Expand full comment
Suszi's avatar

What is the difference between authorized and approved. The FDA loves to stretch the dictionary meaning. Approved means its favorable and good. It is an action of acceptance . Authorize denotes giving permision or allowing. EUA is authorized due to a perceived emergency. Thats where FOI can catch them. No real emergency then or now with these updated version for variants. Therefore without significant studies they cant approve it or call it good or safe or effective as they have no studies to back it up. No reference point. No control group.

Interesting apology from a renowed cardiologist that states he should never have pushed these shots on kids as no studies for children 13 to 17 that were significant and everyone saw massive jump in cardiac issues after these shots and he will not endorse these new updated ones for children under 19. He cant believe he followed the narrative. 50 people isnt enough data when you plan on injecting millions. Insane. Kudos to this brave cardiologist Anish Koka.

Expand full comment
Gina's avatar

94 percent of Canadians have not taken any shots in the last 6 montths. Lets keep that number streak going. The scary kracken variant they tried to put fear into eveyone at the beginning of the year outs their scam. Research it. You will be amazed at what they said. The 94 percent of Cannadians ignored them. No more criminal coercion tactics. Smart people have caught them. The normal influenza season started. Same viruses circulate and we get new strains. Minus the scare tactics of covid era. They tried with flu shots and majority always ignored them. When they try to scare people using the kracken covid variant can get into cuts of beach goers then you know the scam. The only thing you can get is bacterial infections. Or diabetics can not heal quick. The benefits of the beach and sun outweigh fear of a cut.

We have had enough and many are outing this kracken variant surge that wasnt because its proof positive you dont need MRNA injections. The clincher was trying to scare people from the beach and travel. The selfish evil among us.

Expand full comment
The Underdog's avatar

As a constant reminder, proving that the mRNA jabs kill children:

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/proving-the-mrna-shots-harm-children

Expand full comment