15 Comments

While you are checking, I do not believe you will find “Sean Hartman” whose father Dan has been fighting to bring Seans situation forward since his death 33 days post a Pfizer jab. Sean was 17 years old and wanted to play hockey! I believe the data set does not include Sean because an initial autopsy report stated “inconclusive” BUT I understand further work has been done and Dan has commenced a lawsuit for 35 million dollars-I wish it would have been 350 million. When the law suit will be heard I do not know, but it has been started.

Expand full comment

Under the SEC filings of which Health Canada is subjected to and so is Pfizer all deaths have to be ruled as a vaccine adverse event especially those listed in the SEC filing and myocarditis was a listed adverse event that caused Sean Hartmans death.

Expand full comment

Yes , but I believe an initial autopsy stated Sean’s feat was “not able to be ascertained “ BUT I understand that has changed with new information

Expand full comment

Remember we have bought off coroners as well. Paid to stick to the narrative. Unascertained did not allow them off the hook.

Expand full comment

Thats the point. Unascertained and myocarditis from the hospital records of which Sean never had myocarditis prior to the vaccine and was healthy especially to play hockey.

The SEC Filings puts the vaccine as the culprit right off the bat. Yo get EUA they had to pretend to be keeping log of every adverse event and death but instead cover up.

Expand full comment

It's good to see that real journalism still exists in Canada!

Peckford et al v. Canada hearing coming up for anyone interested:

https://cas-satj.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_VehMKVguTaaZ5YIlZPMN3A#/registration

Expand full comment

Oct 11 2023. Federal Court. Appears over 10000 on zoom for it.

Expand full comment

Wow!! Thank you for your efforts and diligence!

Expand full comment

You are amazing!!! Whoever you are. Thank you, I’m earnest for this incredible, important, ESSENTIAL work!!!

Expand full comment

Original reporting like this is the lifeblood of Substack! Keep up the good work!

Expand full comment

Thats great to hear that the period before vaccine mandates had so much conversation on adverse events that they needed more time to generate the documents thus proving they knew the harms of these experimental shots yet mandated it anyways. This is massive material for court action. Health Canada has literally slit their wrists here. Let all lawyers for vaccine mandates lawsuits hear of this admission by the PHAC

Expand full comment

Thank you for this work. It proves one of two things: either those aware didn't care because they were making a shitload of money or, they are in a cult and are hard core believers in the magic and wonder of vaccines and believe some must be sacrificed for the good of the whole (straight up Marxist attitude). It can't be both.

Expand full comment

Another win in a tribunal in Saskatchewan. Tribunal judge rules that these vaccine mandates were an invasion of bodily autonomy and right to medical privacy.

All the coward judges who ruled vaccine mandates are just are being shredded.

Expand full comment

Wow. That's awesome. Do you have a link to that decision?

Expand full comment

Very interesting.

Expand full comment