A 3000-page response to our access to information request, seeking internal communications and documents mentioning Ivermectin, has uncovered something interesting about hydroxychloroquine.
One can never make heads or tails on what our government elects are doing……besides wasting money….that is a given…. And stealing the tax payers dime and filling their off shore accounts…..all the while hoping we all die.
One theory I've seen floating about for why IVM was trashed so badly is because it was an effective antidote for the CV19 pathogen, and you couldn't have that information getting out or the bio-weapon would be useless.
Correct. Same goes for HCQ and several other off-label drugs. When faced with a novel pathogen, physicians have every right to use off-label drugs that have proven effective on similar symptoms, provide informed consent is obtained and the risk profile of the drugs used is acceptable. This is fundamental to the practice of medicine, and yet it was categorically denied as a valid response. Even vitamins C and D were discouraged.
But it's also true that the US military bought up large amounts of IVM and HCQ near the onset of the so-called pandemic. This begs the question of why they would do that. Were they suddenly expecting US troops to be exposed to tropical parasites? Not likely. So then why? It suggests that they knew they were effective against a bio-weapon that had been in development for some time already, and that had somehow escaped a lab, or been intentionally released.
What's interesting is the first article cites 63 million doses, while the second mentions 6.3 million. Is that a coincidence, a mistake, or what is that?
the next drug listed is Remdesivir. " Antiviral drug developed by Gilead Sciences that was given emergency use authorization for hospital treatment of Covid-19 despite being too toxic to treat Ebola." The Wuhan Cover-Up by R.F.Kennedy Jr.
None of this surprises me any more. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. In this case, paranoia is more than justified I'd say.
I wonder if it was used just for certain people? Like the Government and politicians and elite friends?
One can never make heads or tails on what our government elects are doing……besides wasting money….that is a given…. And stealing the tax payers dime and filling their off shore accounts…..all the while hoping we all die.
To decrease the supply?
I wonder if it was used just for certain people? Like the Government and politicians and elite friends?
Or the military.
One theory I've seen floating about for why IVM was trashed so badly is because it was an effective antidote for the CV19 pathogen, and you couldn't have that information getting out or the bio-weapon would be useless.
My understanding is that emergency use of a jab COULD not occur if effective treatment was available
Correct. Same goes for HCQ and several other off-label drugs. When faced with a novel pathogen, physicians have every right to use off-label drugs that have proven effective on similar symptoms, provide informed consent is obtained and the risk profile of the drugs used is acceptable. This is fundamental to the practice of medicine, and yet it was categorically denied as a valid response. Even vitamins C and D were discouraged.
But it's also true that the US military bought up large amounts of IVM and HCQ near the onset of the so-called pandemic. This begs the question of why they would do that. Were they suddenly expecting US troops to be exposed to tropical parasites? Not likely. So then why? It suggests that they knew they were effective against a bio-weapon that had been in development for some time already, and that had somehow escaped a lab, or been intentionally released.
Here's an MSM attempt to explain this:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/17/health/hydroxychloroquine-national-stockpile/index.html
and another from the US military:
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/05/23/more-1300-veterans-given-hydroxychloroquine-covid-19.html
What's interesting is the first article cites 63 million doses, while the second mentions 6.3 million. Is that a coincidence, a mistake, or what is that?
the next drug listed is Remdesivir. " Antiviral drug developed by Gilead Sciences that was given emergency use authorization for hospital treatment of Covid-19 despite being too toxic to treat Ebola." The Wuhan Cover-Up by R.F.Kennedy Jr.
by john Leake: https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/house-subpoenas-andrew-cuomo?r=15eyho&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Totally Criminal!
None of this surprises me any more. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. In this case, paranoia is more than justified I'd say.
Good morning my love