Within the contract dated October 26, 2020, on page 18, it states that the "Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.
Any chance of making this printable. It won’t let me print it & I would love to give it to my doctor because she still refuses to acknowledge that I’m vaccine injured
No, I suspect all the juicy stuff was redacted, and that included a lot of it. However, that Section 5.5 is there for all to see in plain black and white: there never was any guarantee of efficacy or safety from the get-go, and our government(s) were aware of this as 'safe and effective' was pouring from their mouths, and into the whole mandates fiasco. It's interesting that it says that they'll look at those things (safety and efficacy) as the roll-out proceeds, yet no matter how many excess deaths and injuries have transpired (I believe it's about 40,000 excess deaths in Canada since the rollout), plus even admission the shots didn't stop transmission, they are still spewing out 'safe and effective' and pushing it onto babies even. Look at the recent NCI testimony of Donald Best in Regina - a cluster of 9 infant deaths covered up by the Ottawa Police Service, likely at the behest of government. They deserve all that can be thrown at them for this.
I don’t want to read about infant deaths. As it is I’m sick with worry over my granddaughter who got the shot while pregnant. I’m injured and so fucking angry at all of the lies pushed by pharma and our government and all those doctors shilling on behave of the shots.
Any chance of making this printable. It won’t let me print it & I would love to give it to my doctor because she still refuses to acknowledge that I’m vaccine injured
Try giving her your middle finger for starters!
Here's some research of US contract to compare with: https://open.substack.com/pub/karenkingston/p/pfizer-can-be-sued-for-toxic-and?r=1b895l&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
If anybody has the rest of that contract, I’d love to read it.
Did you see the link at the end of the article?
I can’t access it. I can’t spend more money on something else to read. Was there anything unredacted that surprised anybody, that was newsworthy?
No, I suspect all the juicy stuff was redacted, and that included a lot of it. However, that Section 5.5 is there for all to see in plain black and white: there never was any guarantee of efficacy or safety from the get-go, and our government(s) were aware of this as 'safe and effective' was pouring from their mouths, and into the whole mandates fiasco. It's interesting that it says that they'll look at those things (safety and efficacy) as the roll-out proceeds, yet no matter how many excess deaths and injuries have transpired (I believe it's about 40,000 excess deaths in Canada since the rollout), plus even admission the shots didn't stop transmission, they are still spewing out 'safe and effective' and pushing it onto babies even. Look at the recent NCI testimony of Donald Best in Regina - a cluster of 9 infant deaths covered up by the Ottawa Police Service, likely at the behest of government. They deserve all that can be thrown at them for this.
I don’t want to read about infant deaths. As it is I’m sick with worry over my granddaughter who got the shot while pregnant. I’m injured and so fucking angry at all of the lies pushed by pharma and our government and all those doctors shilling on behave of the shots.
I'm open, but the Globe and Mail also claims to have used a FOIA request to obtain a partial release of the Pfizer contracts with the Canadian government in 2021 as per https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-canada-releases-redacted-versions-of-covid-19-vaccine-contracts/?
There's no 'claim' here. Click the link and read it yourself.
I never said there was a "claim." I said the Globe has a similar story which "claims" similar things.
I've read both the stories and the comments in this thread. I'd suggest you do the same before posting spurious comments.