6 Comments

So that's the catch, these assholes can never be found completely in the wrong, the courts always seem to find some loophole that leaves these woke organizations an out. The whole damn policy was wrong, but the courts only found that because he was working remotely, that that was the only thing that was wrong. Jesus Christ, getting so sick and tired of these half-assed "wins".

Expand full comment

First, it is not a court. Second, the arbitrator doesn't have the ability to enlarge the scope of the dispute that is submitted to arbitration.

In general, I agree that the courts have dodged the questions surrounding COVID.

Expand full comment

London, Onterrible might start to realize the errors of their ways and WTFU

Expand full comment

Yeah, a lot of part wins. Sigh. It would be nice to see a big win! One day. 🙏🏻

Expand full comment

That this happened, shows the grip that big pharma has on everyone's testicles.

Expand full comment

"You can see the ruling at the link below."

Just one tip... an arbitrator's decision is not called a "ruling". Use "decision" or "award". Ruling makes it sound like it is a court that has the ability to set precedent.

Expand full comment