U.S. Lawsuit Targets Amendments to PREP Act, Aiming to Hold Covid-19 Vaccine Makers Accountable for Injuries and Deaths
An organization known as React19, with legal support from ICAN, has compiled a lawsuit representing numerous Americans who claim adverse effects or serious injuries from the COVID-19 vaccine. The defendants in the case include the United States Health Resources and Services Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, and three John Does.
React19 is a non-profit organization dedicated to offering financial, physical, and emotional assistance to individuals experiencing long-term adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines. They provide support to over 36,000 Americans who allege they have suffered adverse events or injuries due to COVID-19 vaccines.
As per the statement of claim, the lawsuit aims to contest the immunity to liability and the provisions of the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) within the PREP Act. The challenge is grounded in the assertion that these provisions are claimed to infringe upon the constitutional rights of individuals who have suffered injury or death due to a COVID-19 vaccine.
In the plaintiff's statement of claim, they highlight certain Americans who have experienced adverse reactions and injuries as a result of COVID-19 vaccine administration.
One of the plaintiffs in the case is Alicia Smith, a 36-year-old married mother of two children, aged 11 and 13. Following the administration of two Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines, she encountered issues shortly after the second dose. Subsequent diagnoses revealed conditions including Bell’s palsy, myoclonus (involuntary irregular twitching of a muscle or joint), thyroid dysfunction, lumbar spondylosis (degeneration of the spine), immunopathologic reaction to COVID-19 vaccination, and spasmodic dysphonia (a speech disorder requiring routine Botox injections).
Another plaintiff in the case is Emma Burkey, an initially healthy 18-year-old who received a dose of the J&J vaccine. Two weeks later, she was transported to the hospital by ambulance. Emma developed a small brain bleed and received a diagnosis of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (“CVST”) due to blood clotting in her brain. She underwent three brain surgeries and remained in a coma state for several months. Emma is now in a quadriplegic state, and her daily life involves neurologic restorative therapy five days per week, from 9 am until 3 pm. Medical professionals work with Emma daily to re-map areas of her brain that have been damaged.
I recommend checking out pages 11 through 42 in the statement of claim for additional adverse event cases and details. You can find the full court documents at the link below.
https://icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/001-COMPLAINT.pdf
This is a variation of the type of lawsuit I proposed a while back (see: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/i/101271154/public-readiness-and-emergency-preparedness-act-prep-act) however theirs appears to be a watered down version making... odd demands, such as:
"A. provide an adequate statute of limitations that applies to all COVID-19 vaccine injury claims, but in any event is no less than three years from onset of symptoms"
Why would you want to give the vaccine manufacturers a Statute of Limitations? And Statute of Limitations shouldn't be from "onset of symptoms" (seems like a way to give vaccine manufacturers a 'get out of jail card' via trojan horse given a great many were injured years ago and therefore by the time this gets through the courts, would immediately auto-expire) but from 'point of discovery' (I.E. when the claimant first realises the injuries are actually caused by the shots).
What bothers me is:
1) Children's Health Defense has never even tried a Due Process lawsuit, and
2) React19 appear to be presenting a much weaker version full of loopholes that technically benefit the vaccine manufacturer
It’s time